<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/4/2016 5:44 AM, mayqel qunenoS
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+0uptc=raP+26YjKW4DzXfdE75-DbayWQ121pdmJJkuw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">p.25 :
"if {'Iv} and {nuq} can be pronouns, it follows that they may take
suffixes in the same manner as pronouns, and we would conclude that
the following examples are valid :
{pongDaj nuqpu'}
what was her name ?</pre>
</blockquote>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>I would only—possibly—accept this if you're asking what her name
<i>completed</i> being. Not something one asks very often. Krankor
is confusing tense with aspect.<br>
</p>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+0uptc=raP+26YjKW4DzXfdE75-DbayWQ121pdmJJkuw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">{HoD 'Ivqanq}
who is willing to be captain ?</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>This seems more reasonable. I'm still not sure I accept the idea
that because the pronomial question words can be used verbally
means they must be able to accept verb suffixes.</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAP7F2c+0uptc=raP+26YjKW4DzXfdE75-DbayWQ121pdmJJkuw@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">{'IvvaD ghum chuS'ugh yItlhobQo'}
ask not for whom the bell tolls.."
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<p>I am far more comfortable allowing noun suffixes on the pronomial
question words. I see no problem with that at all.</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>