[tlhIngan Hol] {yeq} - no {-chuq} (no object)

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Thu May 26 21:25:24 PDT 2022


De'vID:
(p. 139, line 28) {lujang meQboghnom 'oH / yeqchuqchu'taHghach / Daw' je
joqwI'}

The question is whether the suffix {-chuq} is correct here. Does the
subject cooperate with the object, do the (plural) subjects cooperate among
themselves, or can the verb be used both ways? {yeq chaH} appears on p. 119
and 121.

MO:
>>> Right. You don’t need the chuq. So it should be {yeqchu’taHghach}.

(end of message)

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20220527/3dc97407/attachment-0015.htm>


More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list