[tlhIngan Hol] {-bogh} {-bogh}'ed nouns and {-taHvIS}

[SuStel]

On 3/15/2022 11:37 PM, Will Martin wrote:
> Show me the canon.
>
> I really think it’s pushing it too far to nest Relative Clauses,

I think so too, but that doesn't mean "you can't do that." The canon is 
that relative clauses stand as noun phrases, and relative clauses 
consist, in part, of noun phrases. Nowhere does it say that they can't 
be nested. There are lots of things that aren't forbidden by the rules 
but still aren't good ideas.



>> On Mar 15, 2022, at 10:05 AM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/15/2022 9:59 AM, Will Martin wrote:
>>> That’s nested Relative Clauses, and no, you can’t do that.
>>
>> Says who?
>>

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20220316/f65c43c5/attachment-0016.htm>