[tlhIngan Hol] {-bogh} {-bogh}'ed nouns and {-taHvIS}

[mayqel qunen'oS]

SuStel:
> Here is a phrase that CANNOT be a noun
> phrase: boghmoHtaHvIS be'pu'. That's
> not a noun phrase; it's only a subordinate
> clause. So since boghmoHtaHvIS be'pu'
> is not a noun phrase, it cannot be the
> object of Qonbogh Qun'e'. If it is not the
> object, it must be atttached to the relative
> clause as a subordinate clause.

Ok, now I understand. I see now where my confusion started.

Thank you SuStel, charghwI', and fergusq for taking the time to reply.

--
Dana'an
https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/
Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20220315/bfccea9c/attachment-0016.htm>