[tlhIngan Hol] {-bogh} {-bogh}'ed nouns and {-taHvIS}

[mayqel qunen'oS]

jIH:
> boghmoHtaHvIS be'pu' Qanbogh Qun'e'
SuStel:
> I suspect you're also imagining the be'pu'
> as both the subject of boghmoHtaHvIS
> and the object of Qanbogh. it can only be
> one, and the other has to be an elided
> chaH.

Yes, that was my intention exactly! But why can't it be both the subject of
{boghmoHtaHvIS} and the object of {Qanbogh}? Is there any rule which
forbids it?

--
Dana'an
https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/
Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20220315/e2b370ce/attachment.htm>