[tlhIngan Hol] paq'batlh 2ed

[De'vID]

On Sat, 23 Jul 2022 at 18:55, D qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> > So briefly, the analysis is not canon
>
> Sadly, this disappoints me beyond words. I feel like I was about to drive
> a Ferrari, and now I'm being given a skateboard.
>

Why? Whether it's canon or not, the analysis contains useful information
which can be verified against the text. If its statements are true, then
they are facts about "canon", whether or not they are themselves
"canonical".

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20220725/fa65e534/attachment-0011.htm>