[tlhIngan Hol] adverb {vaj} conjunction "then" "thus" "and then" "and thus"

[Iikka Hauhio]

The punctuation rules of Klingon are not important as there is no consistent canon, so there is no reason to say that "the comma should have been a period".

Also, as the TKW sentence "nuHlIj DawIvpu', vaj yISuv." shows, Okrand has used a comma before vaj.

Iikka "fergusq" Hauhio

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Monday, January 24th, 2022 at 15.36, Will Martin <willmartin2 at mac.com> wrote:

> My answer was intended to defend SuStel’s correct analysis of the problem with this canon example of the use of {vaj}. I want to be clear about that. Either there’s an omitted conjunction, or the comma should have been a period.
>
>> On Jan 24, 2022, at 8:08 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 
>> Indeed fergusq, reading the Ca'Non examples that you mentioned, I too can't understand why {vaj} wouldn't be one of the best choices for the Duolingo sentence. I'm just wondering reading SuStel's reply, in case there's something I'm missing.
>>
>> --
>> Dana'an
>> https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/
>> Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ _______________________________________________
>> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
>> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
>> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20220124/802d4027/attachment-0002.htm>