[tlhIngan Hol] Beginner's text and questions

[Ed Bailey]

That's an interesting question. The difference in the canon examples is
that -be' follows tu' when -jaj or -'a' is appended. I would expect the
difference to be that tu'be'lu' means that someone unspecified does not
observe (though someone else might), while tu'lu'be' would mean no one
observes, but {yIH tu'be'lu'jaj} doesn't follow this pattern.

cha'DIch, Soj wa'DIch vIqel: Luis, it was all clear to me except for the
last sentence, which evidently I am misinterpreting: "Small deeds of all
citizens and important thing(s) are responsible."

~mIp'av

On Wednesday, February 16, 2022, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> > yIn nI' yISIQ 'ej yIchep
> > Live long and prosper! (RT)
>
> Did 'oqranD write this?
>
> voragh:
> > Finally note the difference between {tu’be’lu’} :
> > and {tu’lu’be’} :
>
> What's the difference? Is there any conclusion to be made from the Ca'Non
> examples posted? Because I don't see any difference regarding the when each
> variation is to be used.
>
> --
> Dana'an
> https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/
> Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20220216/82d348e0/attachment-0015.htm>