[tlhIngan Hol] thoughts on the perfective {-pu'}

[SuStel]

On 4/5/2022 11:30 AM, SuStel wrote:
> Who knows? Maybe there's an unambigous perfective quality verb in 
> canon somewhere that we haven't brought up.

By the way, when I say "quality verb," I mean one that hasn't been 
modified to describe something that is no longer a quality. For 
instance, /paq'batlh/ has *bInenchoHpu',* but that*-choH* turns the 
quality *nen*/be mature/ into an event *nenchoH*/become mature./ 
/paq'batlh/ has quite a few *-choHpu'* words in it. Words like these 
don't count.


-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20220405/496586e7/attachment-0016.htm>