[tlhIngan Hol] Some short questions

[Steven Boozer]

(st.k 11/1997):  [{lo’laH}] is a simple verb in its own right (though it's an unusual two-syllable one), not the verb {lo'} “use” plus Type 5 suffix {-laH} “can”.  It is likely that there is some sort of historical connection to the verb + suffix form, but, if so, it is just that -- historical.

Voragh
_______________________________________________________________
From: SuStel

Oh, and don't forget lo'laH be valuable, which I believe Okrand said isn't necessarily just lo' + -laH.


--

SuStel

http://trimboli.name<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http:/trimboli.name__;!!BpyFHLRN4TMTrA!rPRrcUoPSJNa4GLz7z1eDSpuq8nKTWR9Zb6BaGicKbWJ9fWKnq6qtEDrIrgv5XfWPPk$>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20210922/f8c0268d/attachment-0016.htm>