[tlhIngan Hol] {'e' qa'} "instead of" with the verbs bearing suffixes

[SuStel]

On 11/22/2021 8:16 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
> I don't think there could be any problem with this, but I'll ask just 
> to make certain.
>
> {tlhIngan Hol vIlo'taH; 'elaDya' Hol tIQ vIlo'choH 'e' qa'}
> I continuously use klingon, instead of beginning to learn ancient greek
>
> Would there be any problem with the above? I'm asking since there were 
> no verb suffixes on the given Ca'Non examples which came together with 
> the {'e' qa'}.

There are not syntactic suffixes on those verbs, so they all form simple 
indicative independent clauses. There is no problem here.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name