[tlhIngan Hol] Klingon Word of the Day: tIng
Lieven L. Litaer
levinius at gmx.de
Tue Mar 9 05:25:52 PST 2021
Am 09.03.2021 um 13:02 schrieb mayqel qunen'oS:
> kechpaja:
> > Didn't we decide a while back that you
> > couldn't do that, though? Perhaps
> > I'm misremembering, but I remember
> > there being a whole argument about
> > how you couldn't have two nouns with {-
> > Daq} in a row.
>
> Wow.. Hold on there. Who the jay' said that and based on what Ca'Non?
It depends. The rule says that in a noun-noun construction, only the
second noun can have a Type 5 suffix. (TKD, chapter 3.4)
It is not okay to say {'elaDya'Daq bIQ'a'} for "a sea in Greece".
> Who said I can't say {'elaDya'Daq bIQ'a' vengDaq jIHtaH} for "I'm at
> Greece at a sea city"?
Now come the "it depends" part: If the first noun in such a row has a
type 5 suffx, referring to the following sentence, then it's okay. But
of course, it is a different meaning.
Compare:
- {bIQ'a'Daq jIQal} "I swim in the ocean"
- {'elaDya'Daq bIQ'a'Daq jIQal} "I swim in the ocean in Greece".
The second sentence should be read as
{'elaDya'Daq, bIQ'a'Daq jIQal} (= locative)
and not
{['elaDya'Daq bIQ'a']-Daq jIQal} (= noun noun construction)
--
Lieven L. Litaer
aka the "Klingon Teacher from Germany"
http://www.tlhInganHol.com
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol
mailing list