[tlhIngan Hol] vech

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Thu Jun 17 03:15:49 PDT 2021

On Thu, 17 Jun 2021 at 11:05, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> > (This means the bridge might even be a
> > mile long and not connect the two
> > edges of the river, but still cross it).
> How is this possible? How can a bridge cross a river but not connect its'
> two banks? Is it collapsed on each end, with just a middle part levitating
> over the river?

Consider a bridge over a high canyon, with a river far down below. The
bridge crosses the river, but does not technically join its banks together
(as the banks are still separated from the ends of the bridge by a steep

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20210617/8baf45a3/attachment-0002.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list