[tlhIngan Hol] imperatives with {-'eghmoH} and verbs of activities

[mayqel qunen'oS]

De'vID:
> There are plenty of canon examples
> which should've alerted you that it's
> otherwise, e.g., {yIqIm}, {yIbuS}, {pa'
> yIQam}, etc

Yes, you're right.

I can't understand how this misconception came to my mind.

Perhaps in the past I read about the be-verbs needing to bear the
{-'eghmoH} in imperatives, however, me then understanding "ok, any
intransitive verb takes the {-'eghmoH} in its' imperative form".

Anyway, this proves that we need to reread the relevant Ca'Non from time to
time, in order to avoid any misconceptions becoming permanent.

~ Dana'an
I love you maltz
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20210221/48beb277/attachment-0016.htm>