[tlhIngan Hol] expressing "they are there"

[Will Martin]

jIvanHa’pu’mo’ jIQIj.

QIntlheghvam vIjang ‘e’ vIHech, ‘ach jIQubqa’ ‘ej jImev ‘e’ vIwuq. Qin vIghItlhchoHpu’bogh vIQaw’ ‘e’ vIHech, ‘ach bong vIlab.

DaH yInmeyraj Dachegh.

charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan

rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.

> On Feb 17, 2021, at 2:10 PM, Will Martin <willmartin2 at mac.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Will Martin
> willmartin2 at mac.com <mailto:willmartin2 at mac.com>
> 
> 
> 
>> On Feb 17, 2021, at 12:05 PM, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com <mailto:de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 15:01, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com <mailto:mihkoun at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Suppose we write:
>> 
>> pa', bIHtaH toQDuj'e'
>> there, are (the) birds of prey
>> 
>> If this is correct, then why would it be wrong to say {pa', chaHtaH chaH'e'} ? It's a simple substitution: "there, are they".
>> 
>> Read the part in TKD 6.3 where it says "In the above examples, the subjects are pronouns. If the subject is a noun, it follows the third-person pronoun...". The fact that pronouns and nouns are treated differently here rules out your substitution.
>> 
>> -- 
>> De'vID
>> _______________________________________________
>> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
>> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org <mailto:tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org>
>> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20210217/459a1ba8/attachment-0015.htm>