[tlhIngan Hol] adverbs referring to time stamps

[Will Martin]

DaSjaj HIvqang romulusnganpu’ neH.

vs.

reH HIVqang romulusnganpu’. chaHvaD le’be’ DaSjaj. — or — HIvmeH romulusnganpu’ le’be’ DaSjaj.

> On Dec 10, 2021, at 9:11 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Or a scenario where although mondays are days of truce, the romulans will attack even then.
> 
> {DaSjaj vabDot HIv romuluSnganpu'}
> 
> It's the difference between the english sentences of "on monday even the romulans will attack" and "even on monday the romulans will attack".
> 
> Granted, the klingon goes "on monday even the romulans will attack"; but does the fact that the time stamp comes always first in klingon mean that everything after it (in this case adverb) can't refer back to the time stamp that precedes it?
> 
> --
> Dana'an 
> https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/ <https://sacredtextsinklingon.wordpress.com/>
> Ζεὺς ἦν, Ζεὺς ἐστίν, Ζεὺς ἔσσεται· ὦ μεγάλε Ζεῦ
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20211210/1e96f7e8/attachment.htm>