[tlhIngan Hol] {Dam} in reference to verbs instead of nouns

SuStel sustel at trimboli.name
Fri Apr 30 09:26:28 PDT 2021


On 4/30/2021 12:11 PM, Will Martin wrote:
> While I agree with both of you, looking at the two canon examples, it 
> follows that the other way to say exactly the same thing would be:
>
> SuvwI’vamvaD DunwI’ vIDam.
>
> After all, an {‘urwI’} is just one who {‘ur}s, just as a {DunwI’} is 
> one who is {Dun}.

Yes, you can say it this way as well.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name



More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list