[tlhIngan Hol] numbers and inherently plural nouns
SuStel
sustel at trimboli.name
Thu Sep 3 06:20:04 PDT 2020
On 9/2/2020 11:47 PM, Alan Anderson wrote:
> On Sep 2, 2020, at 7:16 PM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
>>
>> If you want to distinguish speaking targets from body-part targets
>> from other targets, you need to do so by description. The grammar
>> won't do it for you.
>>
>> *ray'lIj 'oH ghotvetlh'e'. ray'Daq yIbach!*
>>
>
> The grammar of that sentence is doing it just fine. It is clearly
> indicating, in multiple ways, that the target is not a being capable
> of speech. It is very jarring for me to see {ghot} as the subject of
> such a sentence.
>
> It’s also weird to try to reconcile the singular pronoun with the
> claimed implication that it refers to a plural entity, but inherent
> plurals are weird in general when one tries to mix them with
> explicitly plural ideas.
My mistake, I should have written *ray' ghaH ghotvetlh'e'.* The grammar
of THAT sentence is doing it just fine, but that's the sentence that's
there purely to explain that the target is a being capable of using
language. I added it specifically BECAUSE the grammar of that sentence
shows the gender. My point is that you can't try to say something like
*ray'Daq yIbach* and add grammar like *-pu'* simply to show the gender
of the noun.
As for using a singular pronoun with an inherently plural noun
representing beings capable of using language, we just got confirmation
by Okrand that this is the case. Said by De'vID in a message on August
16, "I'm working with Dr. Okrand on a 2nd edition of the paq'batlh and
can confirm that the correct pronoun for {negh} is {ghaH}. (Incorrect
uses of {chaH} and verb prefixes which incorrectly treated {negh} as
grammatically plural will be corrected in the 2nd ed.)"
I don't remember whether we have evidence that the pronoun of a "to be"
sentence is based on the first noun or the topic noun, but I believe it
needs to be the first noun, not the topic noun. We're talking about
those people. *ray' ghaH*/they're the targets./ Who are the targets?
*ghotvetlh'e'. *On the other hand, in a sentence like *pa'DajDaq ghaHtaH
la''e',* the pronoun is based on the topic noun, although "to be"
sentences with locatives seem to work a little differently than others.
So if it has to be *ray'lI' chaH ghotvetlh'e',* that's fine; it doesn't
change the point of my post.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20200903/8398c796/attachment-0015.htm>
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol
mailing list