[tlhIngan Hol] vaj and meqvammo' difference

[SuStel]

On 10/9/2020 8:39 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
> ST3:
>> Valkris: Qu'vaD lI' net tu'bej. "You will find it useful."
>> Kruge: vaj Daleghpu'. "Then you have seen it?"
> SuStel:
>> Good examples. vaj can spring
>> from a concept that isn't a reason for whatever follows the vaj.
> De'vam vIyajlaHbe'. De'vam DaQIjqang'a' ?

When Kruge says *vaj Daleghpu',* he isn't saying /Because of this 
reason, you have seen it./ There is no "reason" acting on anything here. 
He is drawing a conclusion based on other information.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20201009/4226ffd7/attachment-0016.htm>