[tlhIngan Hol] indefinite subject of a -lu' bogh clause being the subject of a verb

[SuStel]

On 11/16/2020 9:48 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
>
> jIqon:
>
>
> Qob 'etlh raQlu'bogh
>
>
> DuH wa':
>
> "the sword which someone wields is dangerous".
>
>
> maj..
>
>
> 'a DuH veb tu'lu''a' je ?
>
>
> "someone unspecified who wields the sword is dangerous"
>
>
> mu'tlhegh wot SeSor 'oHlaH'a' je {-lu'bogh} mutlheghHom SeSor'e' ?
>
No, you can't do that. If you must try it, use an explicit subject, *vay'.*

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20201116/18899122/attachment-0015.htm>