[tlhIngan Hol] neH before the neH of a sao

[kechpaja at kechpaja.com]

To add to the original question: we should be asking if before we ask 
why. Are we specifically prohibited from saying {wIjon neH DaneH}? And 
if we're not supposed to say this, is it actually a rule or just a 
stylistic preference?

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 08:22:31AM -0400, jevreh at qeylis.net wrote:
>Wouldn’t <vIghro’ tIQ wIjon neH [‘e’] DaneH> be “you want that we just capture the/a ancient cat(s)”?
>
>Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jun 10, 2020, at 08:00, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Another good question (of the ones which have no answer..)
>>
>> If we can say:
>>
>> vIghro' tIQ wIjon 'e' neH DaSaH
>> you only care that we capture the ancient cat
>>
>> Then why couldn't we say as well:
>>
>> vIghro' tIQ wIjon neH DaneH
>> you only want that we capture the ancient cat
>>
>> ~ qa'yIn
>> _______________________________________________
>> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
>> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
>> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>_______________________________________________
>tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
>tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
>http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org