[tlhIngan Hol] can lo'laH take -laH ?

[SuStel]

On 7/29/2020 7:38 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
> Does this kind of historical connection mean that we can't use the
> suffix -laH on the {lo'laH} ?

It means the opposite: since *lo'laH* is a multisyllabic root verb and 
not *lo' + -laH,* then *lo'laHlaH* should be fine.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20200729/2e46495a/attachment-0016.htm>