[tlhIngan Hol] prefix trick with {-'eghmoH} and {-chuqmoH}

[Will Martin]

wa’maH wej.

bIghojbejmeH bIqeqnIS. reH qIgh neHlu’, ‘ach qeqtaHghach QaQ law’ Hoch QaQ puS.

jIHvaD qay’ qeqtaHghach qubmo' potlh vIjatlhbogh ‘ej tlhIngan Hol vIlo’taHvIS reH ramwI’mey vIjatlh vIneHbe’.

qoH jIH. DIvI’ Hol vIjatlhtaHvIS, pIj ramwI’mey vIjatlhqangba’, ‘ej DIvI’ Hol vIghojmeH qeq vIpoQbe’ba’.

charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan

rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.

> On Jul 9, 2020, at 3:10 AM, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> SuStel:
>> We have insufficient information to draw any firm conclusions.
> janSIy:
>> I don't support the use of the Type 1 suffixes to refer to the indirect object at this time.
> De'vID:
>> I can see no evidence for this claim based on what you're written above.
> 
> ok, thanks ! I didn't expect that things would be so complicated.
> 
> Although, even if we could use the prefix trick with {-'eghmoH} and
> {-chuqmoH} I wouldn't use it since it is disturbingly similar to
> greek/english.
> 
> In any case though, it's good to discuss what can and cannot be done,
> so thanks for your replies, which (prefix trick aside) furthered my
> understanding in what is the actual meaning of {-'eghmoH} and
> {-chuqmoH}.
> 
> ~ Qa'yIn
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20200709/67ec8fe1/attachment-0016.htm>