[tlhIngan Hol] among the various time telling methods is there a formal one

[mayqel qunen'oS]

http://klingonska.org/ref/time.html:
> The second system is an informal way
> of answering the question ’ar­logh Qoy­lu’­pu’?
jIH:
> The problem here is whether the sentence "The second system is an
> informal way of answering the question {’ar­logh Qoy­lu’­pu’?}", was
> indeed in HQ, and of course whether it was written by 'oqranD himself.

On the other hand, even if this sentence *is* indeed Ca'Non, one could wonder..

For something to be considered informal, logically something else must
exist, something else which is considered to be formal.

If the {'arlogh Qoylu'pu'} existed looong before anything else, then
how the jay' can it be considered informal ? How can it be considered
informal if there was nothing else to compare it to ?

The more I think of it, the more everything points to the {'arlogh
Qoylu'pu'} being the formal/traditional method of telling time.

~ Qa'yIn