[tlhIngan Hol] placement of {je} relative to the {rIntaH}

[Will Martin]

It’s interesting how you paraphrase everything when direct quotes are available. Could it be that you like to exaggerate your arguments?

In any case, you seem to be wanting an angry response. You might even read this one as angry, because, hey. You.

Whatever problem there was is resolved, except in your mind.

charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan

rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.




> On Jan 27, 2020, at 7:48 PM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> 
> On 1/27/2020 5:11 PM, Will Martin wrote:
>> It’s a different list now. Each thread is more focused, and any splinters are unwelcome.
> Baloney. Tangents are fine. Telling someone they didn't phrase their question appropriately, then passive-aggressively insulting the person who points out that the question was entirely appropriate, is not fine.
> 
> Let's review the evolution of the early part of this topic, shall we?
> 
> 
> 
> mayqel: Which is correct? rIntaH je or je rIntaH?
> 
> charghwI': Your translation is inappropriately ambiguous.
> 
> SuStel: The translation is perfectly appropriate, because Klingon has exactly the same ambiguity.
> 
> charghwI': You don't care about good expression. You have no heart. I post this knowing I'm making you angry.
> 
> 
> 
> I did not try to censor your tangent. I said it was wrong, and I supplied evidence to support that claim. You responded with insults and no further substance to the topic, or even the tangent.
> 
> 
> -- 
> SuStel
> http://trimboli.name <http://trimboli.name/>_______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20200128/5ad1ba67/attachment-0015.htm>