[tlhIngan Hol] meaning of an {x-mo' verb-be'} sentence

[SuStel]

On 1/11/2020 11:12 AM, Lieven L. Litaer wrote:
> Am 11.01.2020 um 17:04 schrieb SuStel:
>> Yep. And it takes two to tango. By the way, didn't you rage-quit 
>> recently?
>
> Yes, because of you. ("Recently" was more than half a year ago.)
>
> That's why I mentioned that since you are the main reason on this list
> for people to "rage-quit", it's ironic you blame them doing so.


vIpIchpu'be'. ngongwI' vI'angta'.

ghomvam DotlhwIj vISovchu'; reH vISovpu'. ben law' jISaHbe'choHpu'. 
Doghchu' ghomvam woQ tuHmey, 'ej bIH lunuSlu' 'e' luqotlh. jIjeSDI' 
jIyuDHa', 'ach muqaDlu'DI', meqqu'be'lu'chugh, jIDoHQo'.


-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20200111/ad5f628e/attachment-0001.htm>