[tlhIngan Hol] {neH} after {-logh} or {ben}

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Mon Feb 3 23:04:13 PST 2020

On Mon, 3 Feb 2020 at 15:56, Steven Boozer <sboozer at uchicago.edu> wrote:

> In all the examples I know of {neH} follows a noun or a verb.  I checked
> my files for additional examples revealed since July 2013 but couldn’t find
> any.  (Which may only mean that I didn’t record it if it taught us nothing
> new.  In recent years I’ve been a bit overwhelmed by all the new material –
> or maybe it’s just laziness.)

I know there's no canon to support it. I'm still interested in people's
*opinions* of a construction like {cha'logh neH} though. Would they accept
it? Would they use it?

Usually, people are quite opinionated on this list on questions like this,
so I'm a bit surprised people haven't weighed in on this one. (Maybe it's
because I'm not mayqel qunen'oS.)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20200204/faf0a3a3/attachment-0004.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list