[tlhIngan Hol] placement of {-be'} relative to the {-pu'} and {-ta'}

[mayqel qunen'oS]

I've always wondered with regards to the placement of the {-be'}
relative to the {-pu'} and {-ta'}.

As far as the {-pu'} is concerned, since the tkd has the Ca'Non
example of {vIta'pu'be'}, I decided to *always* write {-pu'be'}
instead of {-be'pu'}.

Before I continue, does anyone have something to comment on the above ?

And now I continue..

However, I'm still puzzled as far as the placement of the {-be'}
relative to the {-ta'} is concerned.

So far, I just flipped a coin in order to decide.. But since there are
days, when you reach into your pocket without finding any change, I'd
like to ask:

Are there any Ca'Non examples of the {-be'} relative to the {-ta'} ?

And if there aren't, then what the @!#! should I do ?

~ m. qunen'oS