[tlhIngan Hol] Klingon Word of the Day: luS
qurgh at wizage.net
Fri May 24 09:34:32 PDT 2019
"This may officially be the dumbest argument ever."
Then it's time to stop it, both of you (David and Lieven).
This "argument" is no longer anything to do with with the Klingon language
itself. If you two want to continue to argue about which character to type,
take it off list or switch to using Klingon only.
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:56 AM SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> On 5/24/2019 11:17 AM, Lieven L. Litaer wrote:
> Am 24.05.2019 um 16:58 schrieb SuStel:
> You gave two arguments against the left single quotation mark U+2019:
> it's aesthetically unpleasing, and Okrand doesn't use it.
> Those arguments are also true about the apostrophe U+0027: no
> typographer worth their salt would recommend its use for aesthetic
> reasons, and Okrand doesn't use it.
> So while you SAY use of the apostrophe is fine, the reasons you give for
> not using the left single quotation mark also apply against the
> Then maybe my arguments were not complete and you have overinterpreted
> Right. That's it. I've "overinterpreted" you. This may officially be the
> dumbest argument ever.
> Okrand has definitely used the simple apostrophe. And now, to
> remain very strict nitpicking: the apostrophe is named apostreophe in
> TKD, so this should lead to the situation that every kind of symbol that
> representes an apostrophe IS acceptable as an apostrophe.
> Okay, here's a job for you people with Okrand's email address. Ask him
> this. Please don't elaborate or try to get him to phrase the answer in any
> particular way. Just ask this:
> "Does it matter which direction the line goes in the symbol we use to
> represent the glottal stop in Klingon?"
> The simple '
> apostrophe IS an apostrophe, so it actually even does not matter whether
> okrand has used it or not. Nevertheless, he HAS used it, so need to
> argue here.
> Let's set it straight again for clarity:
> Okrand has used the simple '
> Okrand has used the curly ’
> simple ' is defined as apostrophe
> curly ’ is defined as apostrophe
> left ‘ is NOT defined as apostrophe
> left ‘ has NOT been used by Okrand
> And that's all fine and dandy. Go forth and use ' or ’ in the firm
> knowledge that you are mimicking the character choices used by Okrand
> himself. Amen.
> *The Klingon glottal stop is not an apostrophe.* Okrand uses a couple of
> different symbols to represent the glottal stop, one of which Unicode calls
> an apostrophe, and one of which typesetters call an apostrophe when there
> is no encoding associated with it. He does not mandate which symbol is
> "correct," only that he uses an effing typesetter's apostrophe in TKD.
> Physical typefaces are not encodings.
> It's about the correct symbol to use to represent the Klingon glottal
> stop. And I maintain that it is not actually necessary to exclude the
> left single quotation mark from that role. I don't choose it for myself,
> but my preference is individual to me. I'm not proclaiming it to be wrong.
> As you wish. It's my preference to write a zero for an O and.
> You go right ahead. I'm sure that seems like exactly the same issue to you.
> Okrand was NOT referencing the Unicode standard when he wrote TKD.
> Surely not, but he said that it's an apostrophe. left single quote is
> not an apostrophe. Why don't you want to accept that?
> The apostrophe Okrand speaks of in TKD is what a typesetter with a
> physical typeface recognizes as an apostrophe. It's defined by its shape,
> not its Unicode encoding (which it doesn't have because it's a physical
> piece of type). But Okrand is happy to use a typewriter-style straight
> apostrophe in place of a bend-to-the-left apostrophe when it's convenient
> for him to do so. He changes the symbol he uses. The effing symbol he uses
> is not that important.
> If you were typesetting a book or other publication that you wanted to
> look good, you would surely choose to use a right single quotation mark or
> a typewriter-style apostrophe, because they look good. But when you're not
> dealing with important typography, it really doesn't matter which symbols
> you use.
> Your little character stunt in your email shows how well we humans can
> ignore encoding issues so long as the typeface is familiar. It doesn't
> matter whether you type an /l/ or a /ɭ,/ I can understand you just fine.
> Thank you for demonstrating my point for me.
> You're welcome. It was my intention that you may find it annoying, but
> obviously you don't. You probably just don't want to admit.
> It look me a few moments to even notice it.
> I notice you used a hyphen-minus character after your /Ah./ As a marker
> of an interruption, the correct character to use, according to most
> style guides, is an em dash: —. I see you also used three periods to
> Since when do you care about style guides?
> I've always been quite interested in style guides and typography. When
> Lawrence sent me a style guide for some translation work, I told him I was
> pleased for having it; it answered a lot of the questions I would have
> struggled with otherwise when working on a translation for him. What type
> of quotation marks should I use? Do I mark foreign-language terms? How?
> Which foreign terms get transliterated? These are the sorts of things that
> style guides are good for. They're not grammatical rules; they're the rules
> to follow for a particular publication.
> indicate a pause. Why didn't you use the Unicode ellipsis character, …?
> Because I was using the easiest accessable letters available from my
> keyboard. These include dots, minus-hyphens and also an apostrophe. If I
> decide to make a fancy apostrophe, I choose the one that is defined as
> apostrophe, hitting Alt+0146. I don't choose anything else that just
> looks like one only because I think it's nice.
> Then why aren't you using Unicode Modifier Letter Apostrophe, U+02BC,
> especially for Klingon? "Modifier letters in Unicode generally are
> considered part of a word, this is preferred when the apostrophe is
> considered as a letter in its own right, rather than punctuation that
> separates letters." "Some consider, though, that this character should be
> used for the apostrophe in English instead of U+0027 or U+2019." (
> Wikipedia <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostrophe#Unicode>)
> It's because what Unicode gives you is a standard, not a mandate. If some
> style guide told you to use U+2018 as an apostrophe, you'd do it. Which
> symbols we use depends on how we want to use them.
> Using U+2018 is not "wrong." It's just not standard. There is a
> difference. And that's all that this stupid argument has been about.
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol