[tlhIngan Hol] Verbs of measure

[SuStel]

On 3/24/2019 8:40 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
> jIH:
> > I find defiance of ca'non disturbing
> SuStel:
> > bIvoqbe'mo' vISujlu'.
>
> Interesting.. But let me ask you. What is your opinion, with regards 
> to the following:
>
> bIvoqbe', 'ej muSuj
> you don't believe, and it (this fact) disturbs me
>
> Do you see any problem, with the subject of {Suj} being the implied 
> and unstated fact of "not believing" ?

It's not ungrammatical to elide an *'oH* which refers to *ngoDvam.* 
However, you never established the antecedent in the first place.

What you're really doing is *bIvoqbe' 'ej muSuj 'e'.* This is, of 
course, not allowed.

Another way to translate the line would be *muSuj voqbe'ghachlIj.* 
Actually, I like this better than my first one.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190324/1dc80924/attachment-0010.htm>