[tlhIngan Hol] To -choH, to -'eghmoH, or to nothing ?

SuStel sustel at trimboli.name
Mon Mar 4 10:40:02 PST 2019

On 3/4/2019 1:07 PM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
> Have we ever seen in Ca'NoN imperatives without -choH, and without 
> -'eghmoH ? e.g. yItam, yIjot, yIQong, etc ?

*yIn nI' yISIQ 'ej yIchep
*/Live long and prosper./ (http://klingonska.org/canon/1996-08-rt.txt)

*Dujeychugh jagh nIv yItuHQo'
*/There is nothing shameful in falling before a superior enemy./ (TKW)

*QaghmeylIj tIchID, yIyoH
*/Have the courage to admit your mistakes. /(TKW)

I haven't looked for more.

By the way, *yIQong* should not be on that list, as it's not a verb of 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190304/254e7d58/attachment-0004.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list