[tlhIngan Hol] when -laH cripples the -lu'

[De'vID]

On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 at 10:48, mayqel qunen'oS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:

> De'vID:
> > But why wouldn't you be doing this to begin with,
> > *regardless* of whether {-lu'}/{-laH} were the same suffix type or not?
> > So let's pretend that {-lu'laH} is permissible. What is the passage you
> would've written?
>
> If I was to write a long passage with regards to lets say,
> enviromental pollution, and whether someone as an individual could
> contribute to protecting the enviroment, my first choice would be to
> use -lu', because I would need to talk about someone unspecified.
>
> Of course, vay' could word as well; but my first choice would be -lu',
> provided of course I wouldn't need to switch to vay', as soon as I
> would need to write "someone is able/unable".
>

Write the passage. I want to see how often you actually produce something
that requires {-lu'laH}.

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190319/58f5c806/attachment-0015.htm>