[tlhIngan Hol] Decomposed plural persons

De'vID de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com
Sat Jun 22 07:39:13 PDT 2019


On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 at 15:16, Daniel Dadap <daniel at dadap.net> wrote:

> Do we have any evidence in canon to support the use of verb prefixes
> referring to a plural subject or object, with the persons composing the
> plural subject or object being explicitly stated and only matching the
> person indicated by the verb prefix when considered as a group, but not
> individually? For example:
>

{DuraS tuq tlhIngan yejquv patlh luDub 'e' reH lunIDtaH DuraS be'nI'pu'
lurSa' be'etor je.} (SkyBox 26)
{Qu' DataghDI' 'aqtu' mellota' je tIqaw.} (TKW p.187)

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190622/7f87adfc/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list