[tlhIngan Hol] placement of Hoch in a {-bogh} phrase

[SuStel]

On 7/12/2019 3:18 PM, Will Martin wrote:
> Thanks for clarifying my misunderstanding. I was unaware that {-‘e’} 
> didn’t work like other type 5 suffixes that give a noun a non-subject 
> or object reason to participate in the sentence.
>
> It seems to make it COMPLETELY different from any other Type 5.
>
> Why not make it a Type 6 and give it a special rule preventing it from 
> being used with any Type 5?

See this related quotation for the reason:

    It is interesting that *-Ha’* always occurs right after the verb. It
    is not known why Klingon grammarians insist on calling it a rover.
    It was felt best not to argue with Klingon tradition, however, so
    *-Ha’* is here classified as a rover.

-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190712/594f9a74/attachment-0016.htm>