[tlhIngan Hol] Haw' without the "getting out"
SuStel
sustel at trimboli.name
Wed Jul 24 06:26:44 PDT 2019
On 7/24/2019 8:24 AM, mayqel qunen'oS wrote:
> If we say {juHvamvo' jIHaw'}, the "getting out" carries a sense of
> urgency.
>
> But lets see it in reverse. Can I say {jIHaw'} without the "I flee",
> carrying with it a sense of "getting out" ?
>
> And to say an example..
>
> There is a person in the middle of the desert. He's not in a
> house/tent/oasis whatever.
>
> A second person arrives, and causes the first one to flee, but this
> first person doesn't leave the desert. He flees to another location,
> which is still in the same desert.
>
> Can we say {nuv cha'DIchmo' Haw'pu' nuv wa'DIch} ?
>
> Or since the first person, didn't get out of a place, we can't use
> {Haw'} ?
Fleeing, and *Haw',* aren't about going into or out of any particular
place. They're about withdrawing from some situation.
*nuv cha'DIchmo' Haw'pu' nuv wa'DIch*/The first person fled because of
the second person.
/*nuv cha'DIchvo' Haw'pu' nuv wa'DIch*/The first person fled from the
second person.
/*Qobvo' Haw'pu' nuv wa'DIch*/The first person fled from danger./
//*latlh Deb DaqDaq Haw'pu' nuv wa'DIch*/The first person fled to
another desert location./
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190724/f1d7518f/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol
mailing list