[tlhIngan Hol] placement of Hoch in a {-bogh} phrase

[Will Martin]

Thanks for clarifying my misunderstanding. I was unaware that {-‘e’} didn’t work like other type 5 suffixes that give a noun a non-subject or object reason to participate in the sentence.

It seems to make it COMPLETELY different from any other Type 5.

Why not make it a Type 6 and give it a special rule preventing it from being used with any Type 5?

charghwI’ vaghnerya’ngan

rInpa’ bomnIS be’’a’ pI’.




> On Jul 12, 2019, at 11:50 AM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> 
> On 7/12/2019 11:42 AM, Will Martin wrote:
>> Another option would be {cheS’e’ Sopbogh Hoch.} As for rabbits, all which eat.
> Is this meant to be a noun-noun construction? That doesn't work, because you can't put a type 5 noun suffix on the first noun of a noun-noun construction.
> 
> If it's meant to be two components of part of a larger sentence, like cheS'e', Sopbogh Hoch vIlegh As for rabbits, I see all which eat, remember that Okrand told us that using a type 5'd topic at the beginning of a sentence that isn't a subject or object would be highly marked. It's basically not a real option.
> 
> The only thing that cheS'e' Sopbogh Hoch would normally be interpreted as is rabbit which everyone eats. cheS'e' Sopbogh Hoch vIlegh I see the rabbit which everyone eats.
> 
> -- 
> SuStel
> http://trimboli.name <http://trimboli.name/>_______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190712/9df7d7ee/attachment.htm>