[tlhIngan Hol] Order of adverbials and type-5'ed nouns
sustel at trimboli.name
Tue Jul 9 10:38:56 PDT 2019
On 7/9/2019 1:31 PM, nIqolay Q wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 11:58 AM SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name
> <mailto:sustel at trimboli.name>> wrote:
> Let's see...
> *DaHjaj SuvwI''e' jIH*/Today I am a warrior. /(TKW, KGT)
> This one has a type 5'd noun after a time element. One could
> conceivably argue that *DaHjaj SuvwI''e'* is meant to be a
> noun-noun construction, /today's warrior,/ but I doubt this. Of
> course, there's no OVS in this sentence.
> *-'e'* is sort of an unusual type 5 prefix, since not all words with
> it necessarily go before the OVS part. It can be applied to subjects
> and objects which would have their usual place in the sentence. In
> this case, I think *SuvwI''e'* is more like an object than a distinct
> syntactic phrase. (I know, *jIH* isn't really a verb so *SuvwI''e'*
> isn't really an object, but in terms of where the nouns go, the
> pronoun-as-copula arrangement is very similar to a standard OVS
> arrangement.) So this would be more of a "time stamps precede the
> object" arrangement, which we already knew.
Agreed. This sentence was just the first one I found on my first search,
which was for the word *DaHjaj.* It's not a strong piece of evidence.
The sentence itself is notable for other reasons. It's got *-'e'* on a
noun /before/ the pronoun. I think the purpose of the suffix is
emphasis: /Today I am a WARRIOR (as opposed to whatever I was before)./
I think this is the only time a pronoun-as-to-be sentence has an *-'e'*
suffix on the noun before the pronoun.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the tlhIngan-Hol