[tlhIngan Hol] ordering and scope of adverbials relative to timestamps

[De'vID]

On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 14:07, David Holt <kenjutsuka at live.com> wrote:

> I agree with Lieven. The original question sounds like you're trying to be
> approximate. Embrace the inaccuracy! Is there some reason that it is
> important that it has not yet been a complete year? If so, then you are
> going to have to make that point separately.
>

No reason. Just that I was speaking extemporaneously. If I had time to
think about it, I would've said {cha' waQ qaS wanI' DISjaj wa'DIch} or
something more exact.

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190208/b8f0f341/attachment-0016.htm>