[tlhIngan Hol] yItlhHa'

[De'vID]

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:27, Lieven L. Litaer <levinius at gmx.de> wrote:

> Am 27.02.2019 um 17:21 schrieb mayqel qunen'oS:
> > Would there be a reason, that the ghItlhHa' was given as "lenient,
> > indulgent" instead of "be lenient, indulgent" ?
> > Does the missing "be" change anything ?
>
> No, that's probably just an typo. ghIlab ghew yIbuSQo'.
>

One of my pet peeves about the German definitions in {boQwI'} is that verbs
of quality are inconsistent as to whether they include "sein" (the German
equivalent of "be"). For example, {matlh} is "loyal, treu" while {matlhHa'}
is "untreu sein". But I'm not bothered enough to try to fix this.

-- 
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190228/901f9868/attachment-0015.htm>