[tlhIngan Hol] Can we use {chabal} on its own ?

[Steven Boozer]

We’ve seen similar words to {chabal} “something desired or requested” – e.g. {potlh} “something important, consequential thing” but also {tu'HomI'raH} “something useless” and {Ho'} “something deserving of respect, someone worthy of emulation” (slang).

--
Voragh


From: Daniel Dadap


On Feb 11, 2019, at 07:13, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com<mailto:de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com>> wrote:
Am Mo., 11. Feb. 2019, 12:20 hat mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com<mailto:mihkoun at gmail.com>> geschrieben:
We have the word {chabal}, which so far the only way I've seen it
used, is in the context  of {chabal tetlh} i.e. "list of something
desired".

But could we use it on its own ? For example if I write:

{chabalmeylIjmo' bIbech}
"because of the things you desire you suffer"

Would it be correct ? Would it make sense ?

I see no reason why not.


chabal was given as a word on its own, independent of tetlh, in the new words list from the Saarbrücken qepHom'a' 2015. So it would seem it’s meant to be used without tetlh just as much as it is with tetlh.


--
De'vID
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190211/63358d26/attachment-0015.htm>