[tlhIngan Hol] Can I say maQeHchuqchoHmoH ?

[Will Martin]

Well said.

I can’t find anything here worth arguing about. All points conceded.

charghwI’ ‘utlh

Sent from my iPad

> On Feb 1, 2019, at 3:59 PM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
> 
>> On 2/1/2019 8:19 AM, Will Martin wrote:
>> Now, I am angry and you are not.
>> 
>> maQeHchuqchoHmoH.
>> 
>> We have each changed the state of anger of the other.
>> 
>> It doesn’t matter what the state of anger is. The important part of this statement is the change that we have caused.
>> 
>> Is THAT what you really want to convey with the statement, or are you trying to convey the very different idea that we cause each other to be angry?
> Untrue.
> 
> -choH means a state, as described by the verb, begins. It doesn't allow you to toggle back and forth between states. QeHchoH means only become angry, not cease to be angry. To go the other way, you need QeHHa'choH.
> 
> maQeHchuqchoHmoH we get each other into an angry state
> maQeHchuqmoH we are the cause of each other's anger
> 
> -- 
> SuStel
> http://trimboli.name
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190202/7c186888/attachment-0031.htm>