[tlhIngan Hol] What would you understand if..

[mayqel qunen'oS]

De'nIl:

> {yay} seems redundant: {jIHDaq jIwev} is 

> probably sufficient.


True. I hadn't thought of that.


De'nIl:

> Also, this is just a personal preference 

> but I prefer {QumwI'} to describe the type 

> of {ghogh HablI'} on which such a thing is 

> possible.


True again.


I think we'd discussed this on twitter too. I agree with the fact that nowdays, a phone is much much more than a simple "transmitter of voice".


But the problem which would worry me, is in case I didn't use {ghogh HablI'}, and choose {QumwI'}, {toch De'wI'}, or anything similar, perhaps the reader wouldn't be able to understand that it is a phone I'm actually talking about.


~ m. qunen'oS

In the name of tkd, kgt, and tkw; amen.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190428/e3fd63d4/attachment-0002.htm>