[tlhIngan Hol] How "pure" is Ca'NoN ?

[SuStel]

On 4/3/2019 9:46 AM, Lieven L. Litaer wrote:
> Am 03.04.2019 um 15:21 schrieb SuStel:
>> Hooray! It's now perfectly fine to say *bIvoqbe' 'ej muSuj 'e'!* Because
>> Okrand said breaking rules is acceptable, and we all KNOW what the
>> sentence means!
>
> I'm not surprised that you have to exaggerate again.

I'm not surprised that you don't recognize sarcasm.

My point, in case you missed it, is that Okrand's remarks should not be 
viewed as a slippery slope.


>> And OF COURSE we can say *chenmoH Da'oy' jIH,*//because it's completely
>> obviously what that means. Anyone who couldn't understand THAT one has
>> got to be brain-damaged.
>
> Your silly remark doesn't stop me from admitting that I really have no
> idea was it could mean.

Thank you for demonstrating my point.


-- 
SuStel
http://trimboli.name