[tlhIngan Hol] Expressing "underwear"

[Alan Anderson]

On Apr 21, 2019, at 2:55 PM, Lawrence M. Schoen <klingonguy at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> English used the term "small clothes" in the 17th thru 19th centuries, and there are still instances of it being used today. So why not «Sut mach»?

I was about to suggest {SutHom}, which I think works in most contexts where I would say “underwear”.

-- ghunchu'wI'
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190421/c4be47cc/attachment-0001.htm>