[tlhIngan Hol] Expressing "underwear"

[Lawrence M. Schoen]

On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 3:18 PM Alan Anderson <qunchuy at alcaco.net> wrote:

> On Apr 21, 2019, at 2:55 PM, Lawrence M. Schoen <klingonguy at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> English used the term "small clothes" in the 17th thru 19th centuries, and
> there are still instances of it being used today. So why not «Sut mach»?
>
>
> I was about to suggest {SutHom}, which I think works in most contexts
> where I would say “underwear”.
>

Yes, of course. «SutHom» is much better than «Sut mach», if for no other
reason than because you can say «mach SutHom» when they're too snug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20190421/aea73dfb/attachment.htm>