[tlhIngan Hol] mughmeH laH vs mughlaHghach

SuStel sustel at trimboli.name
Tue May 15 18:45:05 PDT 2018

On 5/15/2018 9:42 PM, SuStel wrote:
> The rules for when purpose clauses must take subjects or objects are 
> not given by Okrand. In general, it appears that purpose clauses 
> attached to verbs (sentences) get subjects (possibly indefinite) and 
> objects, while those attached to nouns don't. But he's broken that 
> general trend from time to time *(qaSuchmeH 'eb; qIpmeH Qatlh'a'; *and 
> even the object-but-no-subject *SuvwI' DevmeH paq**).*

Though this last might be interpreted as a noun-noun construction 
between the noun *SuvwI'* and the noun phrase *DevmeH paq, *so forget 
that one as an exceptional case.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20180515/bd0b116e/attachment-0003.htm>

More information about the tlhIngan-Hol mailing list