[tlhIngan Hol] info from Maltz: audiovisual media

[Philip Newton]

On 25 February 2018 at 11:55, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In answer to how to express "media", "video (visual recording)", and "audio
> (sound clip)".
>
> --- begin quote ---
> Maltz didn’t think that {much} was quite right for “media,” but
> he also wasn’t sure what was included in “media” – the
> phenomena of video/audio/etc. or a physical (or digital) video or
> audio tape or file. What about print? That is, does “media”
> mean “the press” (as in “freedom of the press”)? Does it include
> “newspaper/magazine”?
>
> A video (à la YouTube) could be a {HaSta ta} “visual display
> record.” The audio counterpart could be a {wab ta} “sound
> record.”
> --- end quote ---

In which case I suppose that if an app has a section "media" which
gathers (links to) audio clips and video clips, the section might be
called {tamey} "records" since both video and audio clips are
apparently a kind of {ta}.
-- 
Philip Newton <philip.newton at gmail.com>