[tlhIngan Hol] New words from qep'a' cha'maH vaghDIch

[nIqolay Q]

I'm having trouble figuring out some of the distinctions between the
"stuck" verbs. *mulIQmoHpu'.*

What is the difference between *DIy* and *ngItlh*? It seems like the former
is used for things that get stuck or jammed on their own parts, like a door
and its frame, while the latter is for two things that are distinct and can
theoretically move apart from each other. But I'm not sure I've really
captured the difference there.

What's the semantic difference between *HIr* and *ngam*? Does *HIr* imply
being held in place? Which word would be better used for, say, a gecko
walking on a wall, sticking to it with its feet? My guess is that it would
fall under the category of *ngam*.

On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 3:42 PM, qurgh lungqIj <qurgh at wizage.net> wrote:

> I asked Marc about gher'ID:
>
> ----quote
>
> As for {gher'ID} — All of the English words could be singular or plural,
> whichever makes the most sense given the context.  If, in Klingon, it's
> important to indicate plurality, use {-mey}; if it's important to indicate
> singularity, use {wa'} along with {neH} (or something along those lines).
>
> ------/quote
>
> So, I'm thinking something like:
>
> {pawta' gher'ID! loS qaD vIQappu' 'ach wej wa' gher'ID 'anglu'}
> "The results are in! I won four challenges but one result is not yet
> revealed"
>
>
> qurgh
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 1:10 PM, qurgh lungqIj <qurgh at wizage.net> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 10:06 AM, SuStel <sustel at trimboli.name> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/23/2018 2:47 AM, qurgh lungqIj wrote:
>>>
>>> DaH qep'a' cha'maH vaghDIchDaq mu'mey chu' 'anglu'bogh leghlaH Hoch!
>>>
>>> The new words that were reveled at qep'a' cha'maH vaghDIch are now
>>> available for all to see!
>>>
>>> https://www.kli.org/activities/qepmey/qepa-chamah-vaghdich/new-words/
>>>
>>> If you spot any typos or issues, let me know!
>>>
>>> Very nicely published, thank you.
>>>
>> You're welcome!
>>
>>
>>> *gher'ID* has some odd plurals in its gloss of *results, outcome,
>>> effect, repercussions, consequence, ramification.* Is there a reason
>>> some words like *repercussions* is plural while others like
>>> *consequence* are not?
>>>
>>>
>>> That's how is was presented to us:
>>
>> English: results, outcome, effect, repercussions, consequence,
>> ramification (n)
>> Klingon: gher'ID
>> Notes: "results" with the sense of "score, tally" is {mIvwa'mey}
>>
>> When I first saw it, I thought that it was referring the set of results
>> of a single/collective action, which could be singular or plural.
>>
>> It could also be that they should all be singular.
>>
>> So I will reach out to Marc and ask him to clarify it.
>>
>> qurgh
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20180723/e08396b9/attachment-0016.htm>