[tlhIngan Hol] Expressing "all of us"

[mayqel qunenoS]

DloraH:
> I read [Hoch maH] as " all the us's", "all the we's", as in multiple
> groups.  It is not speaking of the entirety of a single group

I'm afraid I disagree.

If we say, for example, {Hoch vIghro'mey DIlegh}, we will understand "we
see all the cats". All the cats our words concern.

Whether there is just a single group or more, that's unspecified. Though I
doubt, someone's mind will go on to think that there may be multiple groups.

So, I don't think someone will understand, that there are multiple groups
of cats, and the {Hoch vIghro'mey} is used to describe the entirety of
these groups, taken together as a whole.

~ nI'ghma

On Jan 29, 2018 03:20, "seruq" <seruq at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> I read [Hoch maH] as " all the us's", "all the we's", as in multiple
> groups.  It is not speaking of the entirety of a single group.
>
> As for [maH Hoch], similar to the plural suffix, unless you need to remove
> ambiguity, then no need to use it.  Just use maH.
>
> But I can see the possibility of it's use.
>
> A:  mab wIlaj maH
> B:  chaq bolaj tlhIH 'op neH
> A:  maghwI' vIHoH, DaH wIlaj maH Hoch
>
>
> - DloraH
>
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20180129/7e478569/attachment-0017.htm>