[tlhIngan Hol] ngIq and numbers

[mayqel qunenoS]

Felix Malmenbeck:
> «loS mIwHommey'e' ngIq SIQlu'.»
> "As for the four subprocesses, they're endured one by one."

I like this so much ! It is absolutely beautiful !

~ nI'ghma

On Jan 6, 2018 03:01, "ghunchu'wI' 'utlh" <qunchuy at alcaco.net> wrote:

> On Jan 5, 2018, at 3:27 PM, mayqel qunenoS <mihkoun at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering whether we could say:
> >
> > {loS ngIq mIw luSIQlu'}
> > four individual processes someone endured
>
> That doesn’t feel right to me. There is a conflict between the singular
> nature of {ngIq} and trying to talk about more than one of it. Such
> semantic tension might be okay in poetry. I would suggest avoiding it
> anywhere else.
>
> It seems similar to counting things that are inherently plural — maybe
> it’s possible, but I don’t remember ever seeing an example of how to do it.
>
> -- ghunchu'wI'
> _______________________________________________
> tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
> tlhIngan-Hol at lists.kli.org
> http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kli.org/pipermail/tlhingan-hol-kli.org/attachments/20180109/65a9a6b8/attachment-0017.htm>